As we adopt remote work models, what will we enable to enjoy each other? Is everyone just for themselves? If there is no sense of community and physicality, will we ever create another Venice? Another Paris? Even a New York, an Istanbul, or a Kyoto?
Ideas, knowledge, art and what we build has made humans a civilization. We care to learn and transmit from generation to generation. Culture Matters.
The global identity crisis which we are witnessing reflects our need to belong , to be included, to participate. No one will tolerate being excluded from the future.
How can we cooperate at any level when everyone is for themselves and their ideas are any universal values possible ?
Growing up in Europe and up until the millennium there was a model for most: America. The globe was opening up and with it a sense of endless optimism. Today new technologies, globalization and multiculturalism are challenged. The world expanded now it is shrinking.
What will change in 20 years:The nature of work.Capitalism.Gene editing will be used extensively and children will be conceived invitro.Humans and technology will further merge.What won’t change:The deep nature of humans: we are physical and emotional beings.Cultures.
Europe can be the defender of traditional western culture democracies, but only if it comes together.
In a world where nations and cultures are regressing towards their traditional roots, will cities be able to resist and remain an oasis for creativity, immigrants and risk takers?Societies that have a good social contract tend to get too comfortable and societies that are highly competitive but unequal will be more dynamichow do you make sense of this human dilemma? Soft power is aspirational is America losing it ? China will need to learn the art of soft power. Historically it is used to controlling rather than seducing.Will be West ever be able to coexist with China, with its opposite cultural and political system? For the monotheist West, it would be the equivalent of accepting a world of “two truths”. Solutions to humanity’s great challenges need to be human. This means emotional, cultural, philosophical and moral, not just technical, even if technology is used to address them.
Earth was becoming one now it’s splintering. From opportunities to limits. It is a if we had reached the limits of the possible, from freedom to consumption. Now a conservative reaction. Exploration returns to a personal journey rather than a global one.
We live in the age of anxiety loss of control, fear of change.
The response to robotics will depend on culture in Japan robots might be accepted as an entity, as humans are just a form of machine, versus in the West where they might be viewed as foreign and competitive.
Technology has helped us humans for millennia but hasn’t made us wiser or less emotional. Lessons and wisdom from 2000 years ago still resonate across cultures and are our true guiding principles.
Technology may change quickly but human nature changes slowly.
Global cooperation: minimalist vs maximalist approach Wealthy countries, including the West and Japan have become very resistant to change, unwilling to dream big, be courageous and take risks the silver lining is low appetite for hot conflicts. The future is more likely to be led by the developing countries of the East.
LA: the world’s cultural source for the last century.
Democracy needs governance, the specifics of which must reflect local culture for individual nations. Same for economic issues.
The Daoist will fish and wait for the catch, the Buddhist will thrive to find equilibrium, Confucians will apply themselves to tasks and family, and Western existentialists will engage as individuals different approaches to life.
Beyond the difficulties of normal negotiations, the US/China trade conflict is about two parties that operate with different tolerance to pain, objectives and time horizons. Ultimately, they have opposite cultures.
The developing US-Sino trade war is the signal of a potential civilizational clash.
We are living the clash between tech progress & globalization who wins, and can they coexist?
How can one modern and progressive while still retaining ones human roots and identity?
Cultures are reflective and shape societies. Some are quite functional without strong governmental direction, others need it to prosper.
The values to be programmed in AI and biological tools will vary greatly depending on cultures. How do we reconcile and set certain universal standards, or at least share some norms?
No matter the political system and leadership, culture perseveres and determines outcomes more than any other factor.
Culturally, the West will try to stop the tide, putting up a fight. The East will accept the changes that come from the tide
Over the last decades the world was about cooperation, economic development, technological progress and mixing of cultures. We are now in a phase where politics, national identities and apprehension of the future dominate. Governance and cultures matter.
Empower the individual and encourage a multitude of cultural practices, while cooperating on metaissues.
Cultures with a strong sense of individual duty or a direct relationship to a god tend to be the most organized and hard working. They are also the least joyful.
As symbolized by Istanbul being both in Europe and in Asia, Turkey is culturally conflicted between East and West. Ultimately, the choice is democracy with separation and balance of powers vs. autocracy. Or a delicate mix. Secular vs. religious.
The 60s counter culture came from a good place, against violence and war, promoting peace, love and freedom. While liberating, it also diminished community, traditional faiths and purposes, as well as respect for institutions, yet without replacing them with new beliefs beyond the worship of the individual. As humans who seek meaning and togetherness, we are today lost.
The life and cultures of humans are their stories.